Saturday, 15 December 2007

UPSIDE DOWN ECONOMICS


There is a myth that in a country like the UK it is unimaginable that people can go hungry and without a meal. Even more worrying is the perception that there are no poor people in this country.Very recently, a friend related to me how he overheard a conversation in a corner shop where a woman - who would be considered poor by the economic standards of this country - was telling her neighbour how she was terrified about her future. She was especially worried whether she would be able to feed her three children in the coming weeks as her partner had just lost his job and that they were up to their necks in debt. She was also complaining about how the cost of living had suddenly increased.

That incident has stayed with me. From my comfortable perspective, I was not paying too much attention to prices and I decided to do so after hearing about that conversation. I was indeed struck by the way our food costs have soared over the last few months. I used to put this fact down to our growing teenage sons who seem to be always hungry with their increasing appetites. Paying heed to the prices made me reason that the increase is probably related to the rising oil prices.

The economic experts [The Economist Dec 8, 2007 (pp.83-84)], on the other hand, are suggesting that there may be more than the rise in oil price that is the cause for "cheap food" becoming a thing in the past. One theory is that because of the take off of incomes in Asia more people there can afford meat and other foods. In other words - more people are able to eat and have the means to do so. This in itself may not be the reason for the increase in food prices. The related bit is that the demand for more meat cannot be matched as the grains (that are in abundance) to feed animals are used, especially by the USA, to produce ethanol to provide an alternative and cleaner source of energy for the gas guzzlers in that country. Interestingly, one old school of economic theory is being challenged here: abundance in this case (of grains) does not not mean the lowering of prices - in fact it shoots up!

In the meantime, while the pundits theorises, who feels it most? It is the poor, whererver they are, who continue to feel the squeeze from our madhouse economics which will most likely take humankind over the final precipe. Poor people can gaze at supermarket shelves and bazaars filled with Columbus' like trinkets and canned food - they can see these but will never ever be able to touch, feel and taste. I have no heart for rich countries that are feeling the dent because they are locked into importing such trinket or foods. My indignation is directed at the causes that make and keep people poor within and between nations - which will also include my own complicity in all this and whether I am willing to live a counter life.

Indeed, the poor are still with us - as Jesus is purported to have said according to one of the gospel writers. And their condition, instead of improving is getting worse. Free Trade, the new abode of the Western God (now being taken over by the East) is daily praised as the source of plenty and prosperity and in whom lies salvation. As Eduardo Galeano puts it: "Free trade is sold as something new, as if born from a cabbage or the ear of a goat, despite its long history reaching back to the origins of the unjust system that reigns today."

And, do not give me all that spiritualising bull-nonsense about "Blessed are the poor", as human flesh continue to be born in the indigestion of hunger, wallowing in it to ultimately die of hunger. Poor people too want to enjoy full life right here on earth. It is time for theologians to take off from their shelves and re-read all those dusty volumes of liberation theologies (A Theology of Liberation, God of the Oppressed, Minjung Theology and the rows of the many such other books). God's preferential option for the poor should now move from being an option to becoming God's preference and hard talk

For the poor are still with us. In fact, they have always been with us - but the lure and grip of inhabiting spaces in the "master's house" may have intoxicated us and clouded our vision. It is time to get sober, to protest and certainly get angry to act. After all, in economic terms: it is cheaper to eliminate poverty than to maintain it!

copyright jagessar


Saturday, 1 December 2007

THE SHAPE(S) OF GREED




I recall an early incident in my ministry along the coast (Berbice)of Guyana. In one of my sermons, I attempted to respond to the economic state of the country, the effects of the IMF and global economics. In retrospect, this has been a revolving theme in my ministry in Guyana and later in Grenada. At the end of that service an old rice farmer got up (as he would always do!) to say his few words about the sermon. He said: "Pastor, all dem fancy big words you throw at us in dat sermon boil down to one thing: greed - pure damm greed. Call it what what you wish or dress it up in fancy clothes and words: it is still greed." His words, and they were many more on a number of other occasions, have stayed with me. In a curious way this man's thoughts like so many others were beating my theological reflections into concrete and connecting shape(s) in the harsh context of the increasing impoverishment of many many people.


Yes, greed (pleonexia) - the inordinate desire for more and more - may change shape, colour, size and hands, sometimes unrecognizable, but still remains greed. These thoughts and others [that is, the new forms of colonialism] were present as I read that the decline in oil output will incite more wars. Greed, especially in the context scarcity, knows no limit. And as such, it is not surprising to learn that the UK and other nations as well are preparing to submit to the UN its claim of sovereign rights over a vast area of the sea-bed off Antartica.

Remote is one of the words used to justify the right to that claim. This certainly sounds like the earlier and later colonial soundbites of European hegemony.The Caribs, Arawaks, Indians and Africans who lived in the remote Heart of Darkness must be civilised and taught how to live in their own ancestral lands; but first the "civilising agents" must grab all their lands and natural resources.

A difference in this later/new case is that God is not mentioned - perhaps just thought of. Or maybe there is no longer a need to talk about God as in the 1st place that was an excuse to lay hands on the lands of the natives. No need for that now, as the voters will find such an argument unconvincing and besides, God has a chronic housing problem in the UK. It may also be, that it is yet to determine whether Penguins have souls and are in need of salvation. In fact, I wonder what these inhabitants of Antartica would say if they are given voice and agency. Who knows, it may be that a lot of theological ink can yet be spilled on this matter.

And, it is not only the Antartica that the British want to plant their flag on: there are claims in the Atlantic on Falkland Islands, Ascension Island and even a joint claim lodged at the UN by France, Ireland and Spain for a large area of seabed in the Bay of Biscay. With the recent discovery of oil and natural gas in Guyana the Conquistadores will be returning in hordes to the loss city of Eldorado.

Forget the environmental impact and the 1959 Antartica treaty of which these nations have all signed. King Oil, Gas and Greed - the trinity is calling the shots. How do we do theology with this? Where are are the prophets and prophetesses? How do we undress the lies? Eduardo Galeano puts these lies nicely: "Traditional geography steals space just as imperial economy steals wealth, offical history steals memory and formal culture steals the word." Look closer: eurocentric theology or more properly white theology has a hand somewhere in the schooling of all such stealings - whether by guile or by force!


copyright jagessar
Image Credit
The Trinidad Guardian (Sunday 26th Feb, 2006)
Photo by Shirley Bahadur